“ One lawyer of a respondent explained a predicament where both the respondent and the complainant ended up allowed to post only a penned statement before the Title IX office environment built the final dedication. One
father or mother shared a story about their daughter, who was
accused of sexual exploitation on her campus, place by a hearing method, and specified sanctions, for posting (to
a non-public account) a video clip of herself going for walks down a prevalent space Start Printed Page 30059 hallway when someone was
owning loud sexual intercourse in the history. A amount of commenters expressed that they considered
that Title IX investigations were being biased in favor
of the complainant and gave illustrations these as enabling only proof in the complainant's
favor, failing to give the listening to panel any chance to gauge the complainant's
trustworthiness, disallowing the respondent's witnesses from testifying but allowing
testimony from all of the complainant's witnesses, and supplying the complainant far more time to get ready for a listening to or accessibility to additional
evidentiary products than the respondent was provided. One commenter stated that
the respondent was explained to by the establishment that "hearsay was totally admissible" still
the respondent had no chance to cross-look at witnesses producing rumour statements. ”